| Newsletter January 2010: Basel regulators send banks the bill for their excesses |
 Proposals to beef up bank capital and liquidity regulation are tougher than expected. They could force banks to simplify their businesses
By Melvyn Westlake
Bankers, lawyers and analysts wrestling with the implications of the extensive pre-Christmas package of bank capital and liquidity reforms unveiled by Basel Committee regulators have been taken aback by what is being described as the “surprisingly harsh,” “onerous” and even “punitive” nature of the proposals. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Regulatory system was also to blame – US bank chiefs |
 Panel probing causes of 2008 banking crash is told better regulation could have prevented problems. Bankers show little contrition
by Nick Paraskeva
Top bankers are claiming that some of the blame for America's biggest financial crisis since the Great Cepression rests with the regulatory system. Giving testimony at the first hearing of the bipartisan Commission looking into the causes of the 2008 banking debacle, heads of some of the country's biggest banks suggested that better regulation could have helped prevent the crisis. And, they argued against regulatory over-reaction. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Agency split exposed over US securitisation rules |
 Moves by FDIC to write new rules for securitised products seems to jump the gun. Washington regulators divided
By Melvyn Westlake
Differences are clearly emerging between Washington’s regulatory agencies over the rules needed to re-establish a healthy structured finance market in America, and who should write them. These divisions have been exposed by moves at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to introduce new rules for banks’ issuing securitised products – bonds backed by a pool of mortgage loans, credit card receivables, automobile loans or other assets. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Capital buffers may be used to restrict dividends and bonuses |
 One of the most controversial, yet least developed parts of the Basel Committee’s December 17 reform proposals concerns measures to reduce the procyclicality of the financial system. As demonstrated by the 2007-09 financial crisis, booms and busts can be amplified both by the actions of market participants and the effect of systemic factors, including accounting standards, margining practices, the build up of leverage and the adoption of the risk-based Basel II capital adequacy framework. The Basel Committee acknowledges that Basel II has increased cyclicality, but says this is a trade-off for greater risk sensitivity in banks’ regulatory capital requirements. New measures are now being proposed by the Committee to make banks more resilient to procyclical dynamics, and to help “ensure that the banking sector serves as a shock absorber, instead of a transmitter of risk to the financial system and broader economy.” More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: ‘Conservative’ liquidity reg likely to sap bank earnings |
 Two new ratios are proposed to strengthen bank liquidity. But questions remain over cost and composition of the buffers New bank liquidity regulations from the Basel Committee may have been well flagged, but bankers have still been surprised by the conservatism of many of the underlying assumptions in the proposed framework. Until now, Britain’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) has been viewed as setting the benchmark for prescriptive new liquidity rules with the regime it is planning to start phasing in this year. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Counterparty risk measures will boost centralised derivative clearing |
 A key benefit of the Basel Committee’s proposal to strengthen capital requirements for counterparty credit risk (CCR) is that it will also provide a powerful mechanism to induce banks active in over-the-counter derivatives markets to clear as many deals as possible through central counterparties. It has become a major policy objective among regulators in both the EU and US to ensure as high a proportion as possible of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions become standardised, cleared through multilateral arrangements and traded on exchanges. Incentives for financial firms using central counterparties are being considered on both sides of the Atlantic, while firms undertaking customised, bilaterally cleared transactions are threatened with higher capital charges. The Basel Committee’s December 17, CCR reform proposals will go a long way to achieving that policy objective. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: 2010 – Year of Regulation |
 A tsunami wave of new regulation is heading towards the financial sector in the wake of the global crisis, one top international regulator has famously said, and 2010 is the year when the wave starts hitting the shore. Below is a diary of the implementation dates, events, meetings, deadlines and timelines that will mark the progress of the racing wave. For many of the key regulatory developments there is no precise date, only an aspirational one such as “by the middle of the year” or “by the end of 2010”. This is particularly true of the United States, for instance, where analysts are currently suggesting a new regulatory framework won’t be in place before the middle of the year, its exact shape dependent on the compromises that will have to be made between rival proposals in Congress and the US Administration’s own reform package. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Japan consults on financial regulation plans |
 TOKYO – Japan’s Financial Services Agency is beginning a public consultation on a range of new financial regulations that it is considering submitting to the parliament – the Diet – early in 2010. The areas where action is being considered were set out in a paper* issued for comment in mid-December. They include: regulation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions; regulation of hedge funds; strengthening of securities clearing and settlements systems; investor protection; consolidated regulation for securities firms; and reporting of ‘short selling.’ The measures have been made necessary by the global financial crisis and agreed international decisions such as those reached by leaders of the Group of 20 most important economic countries, as well as developments in Japan’s financial and capital markets. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Stability report urges banks to conserve capital |
 LONDON – Amid the furore over bankers’ 2010 bonuses, the Bank of England is telling banks that they should not only take advantage of current favourable market conditions to raise new capital, but also conserve capital by reducing staff costs and cutting dividends. While it is not yet clear by how much base capital might need to increase as a consequence of all the new regulatory requirements now in the pipeline, it is likely to be “significant,” the Bank warns in its latest Financial Stability Report, published in mid-December. Reducing staff costs by around one tenth and dividend payout rates by around a third would allow British banks to increase retained reserves by close to
£70 billion ($113.7billion)over the next five years, the central bank calculates. This would boost core Tier 1 ratios by 100 basis points over the same period, it says.
More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Reinsurance under ‘macro’ surveillance |
 BASEL – Insurance supervisors will continue to exercise “macroprudential surveillance” of the global reinsurance market, although the industry has shown a robustness and resilience that’s contributed to the overall stability of insurance markets. In an end-year report* the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) acknowledges that reinsurance, the vital business that insures insurers, appears not to have played a role in the global financial crisis. But the industry has been affected by the crisis due to many inter-linkages at play among financial market participants, says the IAIS report which is built on data provided by 51 leading reinsurers. The Basel-based IAIS brings together insurance supervisors from nearly 140 countries with the aim of developing global insurance standards. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: Islamic finance industry must review transparency |
 MANAMA – Regulators need to consider whether the use of off-balance sheet special purpose vehicles in Islamic finance gives rise to the same lack of transparency that occurred with off-balance sheet structured investment vehicles (SIVs) in conventional finance, a leading Middle East central banker said in mid-December. Central Bank of Bahrain governor Rasheed Mohammed Al Maraj said some of the lessons of the global financial crisis are quite general and apply equally to conventional, interest-charging finance as well as to Islamic finance, which observes the Sharia (Islamic) law bar on charging interest on loans. More>>> |
|
| Newsletter January 2010: US energy trading limits less than feared |
 WASHINGTON – Moves by US regulators to limit speculation in energy futures, awaited with mixed feelings by non-US exchanges since last summer, appeared at first sight to be less draconian than many had feared. As GRR went to press, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) proposed limits on energy speculation that could curtail the activities of large banks and swaps dealers in the markets for oil, natural gas, heating oil and gasoline. Speculators in energy markets will no longer enjoy the same trading rights as so-called ‘bona fide hedgers’ such as airlines and oil companies. As consumers and producers of energy commodities, such firms will be allowed to exceed the limits proposed on the number of energy futures one trader can hold. More>>> |
|
Global Risk Regulator Global Risk Regulator, risk management, financial information