Procedural changes have done little to assuage political divide on whether insurers should be designated as systemically important financial institutions.
Latest articles from Philip Alexander
Procedural changes have done little to assuage political divide on whether insurers should be designated as systemically important financial institutions.
The European Securities and Markets Authority may acknowledge the need for a rethink in light of consultation paper responses.
The European Parliament has agreed a compromise on money market funds, but member states remain deeply divided.
Gunnar Hökmark is hoping that a risk-based approach to trading desk separation that will allow for national discretion will enable agreement.
Technical advice for the bank resolution and recovery directive has underscored the improbability that it will ever be used for the largest banks.
The US designation debate casts a shadow over international consultation on how to identify and respond to systemic risk in asset management.
Industry participants are relieved that global rules governing the posting of margin on derivative trades that are not centrally cleared have been postponed to reflect the slow legislative process in key jurisdictions.
Futures and swaps market participants believe proposed European rules governing transparency will classify far too many instruments as liquid.
Financial industry trade associations are calling for the Basel Committee to take stock of the existing bank capital framework before introducing radical changes to risk-weighted assets.
The market data used by banks as inputs for their internal capital models could be the next target for regulatory initiatives. An industry-led solution looks possible.
We use cookies for a number of reasons, such as keeping FT Sites reliable and secure, personalising content and ads, providing social media features and to analyse how our Sites are used.